Supporting material

Course Case Bank

These wiki posts give the course concrete stories: why AI literacy matters, what human judgment still controls, and how students can turn agent-assisted work into evidence.

Use these as hooks, discussion cases, or optional readings. The summaries here are course placements, not fresh verification of every external claim inside the original posts.

Topic 1 Hooks: What AI Means For Students

Use these for a short opening discussion, not a full reading assignment. The goal is to show students that AI literacy is about problem definition, collaboration, verification, and shipping useful work.

Topic 1 hookRevisit Topic 11

Forward Deployed Engineer

AI changes many technical workflows. The valuable person understands the problem, talks to stakeholders, uses agents, verifies outputs, and owns a working system.

Read post
Topic 1 hookTopic 8/10 reuse

Problem Definition Wins

A domain expert with a clear problem can outperform faster coders. Students should learn to specify the right thing before asking an agent to build.

Read post
Topics 1-3Reflection

AI Fluency Index

Fluent users manage AI rather than delegate blindly: they iterate, ask for missing context, critique polished output, and keep responsibility for the work.

Read post

Topics 2-3: Agent Mindset, Limits, and Responsibility

Use these to connect agent setup, human review, and responsible use. Keep provocative claims instructor-framed unless sources are reverified before class.

Topic 2 framing

End of Coding

Useful for macro-action thinking: students direct agents through goals, context, tools, branches, and review rather than only typing code by hand.

Read post
Topic 2/8/10

Frustration Shifts Upward

AI reduces syntax friction but makes specification, architecture, diagnosis, and review more important. This supports the whole agent-based course design.

Read post
Topic 3 reflection

AI Brain Fry

Student-facing case for cognitive load, tool switching, verification fatigue, and why a small deliberate AI stack can beat more tools.

Read post

Topics 8-10: Building With Agents

Topic 8/10

Problem Definition Wins

Return to this as a full app-building case: before students prompt an agent, they must define audience, workflow, constraints, and success criteria.

Read post
Topic 10

Frustration Shifts Upward

Use when students hit app complexity. The issue is often not "how do I code it?" but "did I choose the right structure?"

Read post

Topic 11 and Topic 14: Career, Learning, and Portfolio

Topic 11

Career-Ops

Agent workflow for evaluating postings, tailoring materials, tracking applications, and preserving human control. Good homework case: do not auto-submit.

Read post
Topic 11/14

Agent Portfolio Evidence

Students should show prompts, setup, agent instructions, tests, and verification habits, not just polished screenshots of final projects.

Read post
Topic 11 optional

Context-Rich Learning

Optional study-skills case: learning works better when AI connects vocabulary or facts to authentic context rather than isolated memorization.

Read post

Topic 12: Prompting and Model Behavior

Topic 12

Shortest Prompt Lines

Use as compact prompt-review moves after students learn structured prompts: ask for missing context, disagreement, uncertainty, and critique.

Read post
Topic 12 optional

Bilingual Prompting

Optional extension for bilingual students and model-behavior discussion. Verify numeric research claims before teaching them as facts.

Read post

Hidden Teacher Training

These belong mainly in the hidden teacher-training chapter. They are about educator workflows, feedback, rubrics, and the line between support and outsourcing.

Teacher training

Teacher Factory

Frames AI as a teacher material-production system: custom activities, rubrics, examples, and differentiated supports.

Read post
Teacher training

NotebookLM Grading Paradox

Use for instructor-only discussion of rubric-grounded feedback, privacy, academic integrity, and human responsibility in grading.

Read post
Rubric input

AI Fluency Index

Use as a teacher-facing rubric input: look for iteration, critical review, uncertainty handling, and collaboration settings.

Read post

Topic 13 and Advanced Enrichment

Use teacher-selected excerpts. These are useful for evidence quality and expert verification, but too specialized for required CS-215 reading without simplification.

Topic 13 excerpt

Mythos Verification Crisis

Evidence-quality case: how should students read model-risk claims, vendor claims, restricted-access claims, and independent evaluations?

Read post
Advanced excerpt

Automated Alignment Researchers

Advanced case in evaluation and AI research workflows. Useful for discussing benchmark integrity and scalable oversight.

Read post
Discussion only

Medical AI Scientist

High-stakes caution case. Use for ethics discussion only, not student emulation or workflow imitation.

Read post
Topic 5 optional

AI Quant Tools

Optional domain application for finance/time series. Too specialized for required Excel/admin workflow.

Read post
Topic 2 optional

Subquadratic Attention

Advanced architecture and skepticism example. Keep out of core flow unless students are ready for attention/computation tradeoffs.

Read post
Advanced coding

TurboQuant

Case for human expertise in low-level AI-assisted coding. Useful later, but not required for CS-215.

Read post
Optional enrichment

TensorTonic

For students who want ML fundamentals. Good enrichment, but not central to the agent-app course path.

Read post

How To Use This Bank

For student modules

  • Use one hook slide, one discussion question, or one short reflection.
  • Promote only Topic 11 career and Topic 13 verification cases into heavier reading.
  • Keep technical posts as excerpts unless the class has the prerequisites.

For teacher prep

  • Use teacher-facing posts to design rubrics, examples, feedback workflows, and disclosure rules.
  • Reverify external sources before making numeric claims in class.
  • Favor cases that reinforce human judgment, not tool worship.