Topic 14 hubStudy Sprint dossierRehearsal studioFeedback cardsThis page never saves any field, including your name. It warns before navigation when entries exist. Copy or print before leaving.
Topic 14 · Page 1 of 4 · Purpose and demonstration

Final Showcase Evidence Packet

The final is a bounded evidence defense, not a polish contest or proof of production readiness. Draft fields across both meetings; use one or two concise sentences per field.

Equal-credit routes: no public URL, prior app or packet, live AI, account, paid tool, reliable network, spoken performance, video recording, polished interface, personal career disclosure, or certificate is required. Request a private or alternate route without explaining a diagnosis.

1. Purpose and bounded capability claim

2. Visible demonstration plan

INPUT / STARTWhat will the reviewer first see?
ACTIONWhat bounded interaction or record is shown?
OUTPUTWhat visible result supports the claim?
LIMITWhat will this demonstration not establish?
Presenter control: never project credentials, private prompts or chats, account/device screens, private paths, grades, health or identity data, consent/assent records, unpublished peer work, or notifications. Switch to the fallback immediately if private content appears.
Topic 14 · Page 2 of 4 · Evidence defense

Process, claim, and human-control evidence

Each record names the evidence route and limitation. Recreate with Study Sprint if a prior packet is unavailable.

3. One human process decision

4. One claim and source trail

5. One security, privacy, safety, or human-control decision

Calibration: a source, screenshot, test, scan, AI suggestion, or supplied record supports only the claim it actually addresses. Do not claim complete accuracy, safety, security, effectiveness, accessibility, or production readiness.
Topic 14 · Page 3 of 4 · Assistance and feedback

Make collaboration and revision visible

Citation/source records and assistance disclosure are separate jobs. No full chat or peer identity is required.

6. Assistance disclosure or no-AI statement

No-AI route: state that no AI was used and name any course, peer, instructor, accessibility, or other human support that materially shaped the work. Do not disclose a disability or private support context.

7. One anonymous feedback record

Reviewer unavailable: use the fixed Study Sprint dossier comment, structured self-review, or instructor review for equivalent evidence. Do not invent a peer identity.

8. Bounded revision or justified no-change decision

Peer privacy: summarize the feedback without a name, grade, contact detail, private conversation, or personality judgment.
Topic 14 · Page 4 of 4 · Defense close

Question response, limitation, and next step

The observable submission ends with a calibrated answer. Private course reflection remains separate unless the LMS explicitly requests it.

9. One difficult reviewer question

10. Final calibrated close

11. No-secrets and route statement

12. Submission check if assigned in the LMS

Observable evidence Status Missing, blocked, or alternate-route note
Purpose, bounded claim, demonstration route
Process, source/claim, human-control evidence
Disclosure, anonymous feedback, revision
Question response, limitation, next step, privacy check
If assigned: submit this packet, a rendered Rehearsal Studio summary, LMS text, DOCX/export, scanned paper, speech-to-text, an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) supported response, or another approved equivalent. You may use the Studio to draft this packet, but submit one final format only. The LMS supplies points, deadline, late rules, accepted upload type, and resubmission. Private reflection is not automatically part of this observable record.